Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Investigation of Social Media Use Motivations in Terms of Personality Traits and Life Satisfaction

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1, 205 - 226, 23.03.2021

Şükran Karaca

https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.763305
Cited By: 2

Öz

With the development of technology, social media became popular and 1widely used in daily life. Especially, the increase in the use of smart phones and the improvement of the internet connection has increased the use of social media day by day. There is a relationship between the personality traits and life satisfaction of social media users and the selection, usage and frequency of social media tools. Therefore, this study was carried out to examine social media usage motivations in terms of personality traits and life satisfaction. Within the scope of the study, data obtained from 385 people using the online survey technique were analyzed. As a result of the research, it was concluded that especially the neurotic personality trait of social media users had a significant effect on their motivation to use social media and life satisfaction.
Keywords: Social Media, Social Media Motivations, Personality, Life Satisfaction
JEL Classification: M30, M31

Kaynakça

  • Alexa (2020). The top 500 sites on the web. Retrieved April 24, 2020, from: https://www.alexa.com/topsites.
  • Alhabash, S. ve Ma, M. (2017). A Tale of Four Platforms: Motivations and Uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat Among College Students? Social Media+ Society.
  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y. ve Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social Network Use And Personality. Comput. Hum. Behav, Vol. 26, 1289-1295. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018
  • Amiel, T. ve Sargent, S. L. (2004). Individual Differences İn Internet Usage Motives. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.20, Iss.6, 711–726.
  • Avcılar, M. Y. ve Külter Demirgüneş, B. (2016). Kişilik Özelliklerinin Sosyal Medya Kullanım Motivasyonları Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Tespiti. Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics, Cilt 3, Sayı 3, 251-271.
  • Baldwin. K. ve Tinsley, H. (1988). An investigation of the validity of Tinsley and Tinsley’s (1986). Theory of leisure experience. Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 35, Iss.3, 263-267.
  • Bollen, J., Gonçalves, B., Ruan, G. ve Mao, H. (2011). Happiness is Assortative İn Online Social Networks. Artificial Life, Vol.17, Iss.3, 237-251. doi:10.1162/artl_a_00034
  • Butt, S. ve Phillips, J. G. (2008). Personality and Self-Reported Mobile Phoneuse. Comput. Hum. Behav., Vol 24, 346–360. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.019
  • Carr, C. T. ve Hayes, R. A. (2015). Social Media: Defining, Developing, And Divining. Atlantic Journal Of Communication, Vol. 23, 46–65.
  • Cha J. (2010). Factors Affecting The Frequency And Amount Of Social Networking Site Use: Motivations, Perceptions, And Privacy Concerns, First Monday, Vol.15, Iss.12, 2-16.
  • Choi, T. R., Sung, Y., Lee, J. A. ve Choi, S. M. (2017). Get Behind My Selfies: The Big Five Traits And Social Networking Behaviors Through Selfies. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 109, 98–101.
  • Clore, G. L.,Wyer Jr, R. S., Dienes, B., Gasper, K., Gohm, C. ve Isbell, L. (2001). Affective Feelings As Feedback: Some Cognitive Consequences. In L. L. Martin, ve G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A User's Guide Book (pp. 27-62). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W. ve Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?:The İntersection Of Users' Personality And Social Media Use. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26, Iss. 2, 247-253.
  • Diener, E., Sandvik, E. ve Pavot, W. (2009). Happiness is The Frequency, Not The İntensity, Of Positive Versus Negative Affect. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing Well-Being (Vol. 39, pp. 213-231). Netherlands: Springer.
  • Diener, E.,Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. ve Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 49, Iss.1, 71-75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
  • Doğan, U. (2016). Effects of Social Network Use on Happiness, Psychological Well-being, and Life Satisfaction of High School Students: Case of Facebook and Twitter. Educationand Science, Vol 41, 217-229.
  • Fullwood, C., Nicholls, W. ve Makichi, R. (2014). We’ve Got Something For Everyone: How İndividual Differences Predict Different Blogging Motivations. New Media Soc., Vol. 17, 1583–1600. doi: 10.1177/1461444814530248
  • Ghaisani, A. P., Handayani, P. W., ve Munajat, Q. (2017). Users' Motivation in Sharing Information on Social Media. Procedia Computer Science, Vol.124, 530-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.186
  • Google+ (2020). About Google+. Retrieved April 1, 2020, from: https://plus.google.com/about?hl=tr.
  • Gosling, S. D., Augustine, A. A., Vazire, S., Holtzman, N. ve Gaddis, S. (2011). Manifestations of Personality İn Online Socia Lnetworks: Self-Reported Facebook-Related Behaviors And Observable Profile İnformation. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw, Vol 14, 483–488. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0087
  • Horzum, M. B. (2016). Examining The Relationship To Gender And Personality On The Purpose Of Facebook Usage Of Turkish University Students. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 64, 319–328.
  • INTECO (2009): “Estudiosobre la privacidad de losdatospersonales y la Seguridad De La İnformación En Lasredes Sociales Online”. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología de la Comunicación y AgenciaEspañola de Protección de datos, Observatorio de la seguridad de la información, http://creativecommons.org
  • Papacharissi, Z. ve Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of İnternet Use. Journal of Broadcasting& Electronic Media, Vol. 44, Iss. 2, 175–196.
  • Jamal J. Al-Menayes (2015). Motivationsfor Using Social Media: An ExploratoryFactor Analysis, International Journal of Psychological Studies, Vol. 7, Iss. 1, 43-50.
  • Junco, R. (2013). Comparing Actual and Self-Reported Measures Of Facebook Use. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 29, Iss. 3, 626–631
  • Kahneman, D. ve Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments İn The Measurement Of Subjective Well-Being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.20, Iss. 1, 3-24.
  • Karapanos, E.,Teixeira, P. ve Gouveia, R. (2016). Need Fulfillment And Experiences On Social Media: A Case On Facebook And Whatsapp. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 55, 888–897.
  • Katz, E., Blumler, J. G. ve Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and Gratifications Research. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 37, Iss. 4, 509–523.
  • Khan, M. L. (2017). Social Media Engagement: What Motivates User Participation And Consumption On Youtube? Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.66, 236–247.
  • Kim, J. W. ve Chock, T. M. (2017). Personality Traits And Psychological Motivations Predicting Selfie Posting Behaviors On Social Networking Sites. Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 34, Iss.5, 560–571.
  • Kuss, D. J. ve Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social Networking Sites And Addiction: Ten Lessons Learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 14, 311.
  • Landers, R. N. ve Lounsbury, J. W. (2006). An investigation of BigFiveandnarrowpersonalitytraits in relationto Internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2006), 283–293.
  • Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessonsfrom a Newscience. London: Penguin Books.
  • Leary, M. R. ve Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression Management: A Literatüre Review And Two Component Model. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 107, Iss.1, 34-47. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34
  • Lee, E.,Ahn, J. ve Kim, Y. J. (2014). Personality Traits And Self-Presentation at Facebook. Pers. Individ. Diff. Vol. 69, 162–167. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.020
  • Li, Yuhui, Huang, Zhaoxhing, Wu, YenchunJim ve Wang, Zhiqiang (2019). Exploring How Personality Affects Privacy Control Behavior on Social Networking Sites, Front. Psychol, Vol. 10,1771
  • Lin, Jhih-Syuani Lee, Yen-I, Jin, Yan ve Gilbreath, Bob (2017). Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, Vol. 20, Iss.10, 615-623.
  • Liu, I. L. B., Cheung, C. M. K. ve Lee, M. K. O. (2010). Understanding Twitter Usage: What Drive People Continue T Otweet. In PACIS 2010 proceedings (p. 92). Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Livingstone, S. (2010). Taking Risky Opportunities İn Youth Fulcontent Creation: Teenagers’ Use Of Social Networking Sites Forintimacy, Privacyand Self-Expression. New Media &. Society, Vol. 10, Iss..3, 393-411.
  • Lloyd, K. ve Auld, C. J. (2002). The Role of Leisure in Determining Quality Of Life: Issues of Content and Measurement. Social Indicators Research, Vol.57, Iss.1, 43-71.
  • Lu, Luo ve Hu, Chia-Hsin (2005). Personality, Leisure Experiences and Happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 6, Iss.3, 325-342.
  • Misoch, S. (2015). Stranger on The İnternet: Online Self-Disclosure and The Role Of Visual Anonymity. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.48, 535–541.
  • Moore, K. ve McElroy, J. C. (2012). The İnfluence Of Personality On Facebook Usage, Wall Postings, And Regret. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 28, Iss.1, 267–274.
  • Obi, A. N. (2014). Time Spend on Facebook vs. Total Time Spent Online: Effects On The Quality Of Life On High School Students (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Golden GateUniversity, USA.
  • Ong, E. Y. ,Ang, R. P., Ho, J., Lim, J. C., Goh, D. H., Lee, C. S., et al. (2011). Narcissism, Extraversion And Adolescents’ Self-Presentation On Facebook, Pers. Individ. Dif. Vol.50, 180–185. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.022
  • Quan-Haase, A. ve Young, A.L. (2010) Uses and Gratifications of Social Media: A Comparison of Facebook and Instant Messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Vol.30, 350-361.
  • Rae, J. R. ve Lonborg, S. D. (2015). Do Motivations Forusing Facebook Moderate The Association Between Facebook Use And Psychological Well-Being? Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6, 771.
  • Ross, C., E.S. Orr, M. Sisic, J.M. Arseneault, M.G. Simmering ve R.R. Orr (2009). Personality and Motivations Associated with Facebook Use. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 25, 578-586.
  • Rubin, A. M. (1993). Audience Activity And Media Use. Communications Monographs, Vol. 60, Iss.1, 98–105.
  • Ruggiero T. E. (2000). Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, Vol. 3, Iss.1, 3–37.
  • Ryan, T., ve Xenos, S. (2011). Who Uses Facebook? An İnvestigation İnto The Relationship Between The Big Five, Shyness, Narcissism, Loneliness, And Facebook Usage. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 27, Iss.5, 1658–1664.
  • Scheufele, D. A. ve Shah, D. V. (2000). Personality Strength And Social Capital: The Role Of Dispositional And İnformational Variables İn The Production Of Civic Participation. Journal of Communication Research, Vol.2, Iss.2, 107-131.
  • Seidman, G. (2012). Self-Presentation And Belonging On Facebook: How Personality İnfluences Social Media Use And Motivations. Pers. Individ. Dif, Vol. 54, 402–407. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.009
  • Swickert, R.,Hittner, J., Harris, J. ve Herring, J. (2002). Relationships Among Internet Use, Personality, And Social Support. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.18, Iss.4, 437–451.
  • TandocJr, E. C., Ferrucci, P. ve Duffy, M. (2015). Facebook Use, Envy, And Depression Among College Students: Is Facebooking Depressing? Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.43, 139-146.
  • Tsai, Lien-Hsiang (2003). Relationships Between Personality Attributes and Internet Marketing, A Dissertation, Alliant Internatıonal Unıversity, UMI.
  • Tuncer, D., Arpacı, T., Ayhan, Y., Böge, E. ve Üner, M. (1992). Pazarlama, Ankara: Gazi Yayınları.
  • Urista, M.A.,Dong, Q. ve Day, K.D. (2009). Explaining Why Young Adults Use My Space And Facebook Through Uses And Gratifications Theory. Human Communication, Vol.12, Iss.2, 215- 229.
  • Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend Networking Sites And Their Relationship To Adolescents' Well-Being Ands Ocial Self-Esteem. Cyberpsychol & Behavior, Vol. 9, Iss.5, 584-590.
  • Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users Like You? Theorizin Gagency in User-Generated Content. Media. Culture & Society, Vol. 31, Iss.1, 41-58.
  • Wang, Y. (2006). Internet Use Among Students and Its Implication for Cross-Cultural Adaptation Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Kent State University.
  • Wankel, L. ve Berger, B. (1990). The Psychological And Social Benefits Of Sport And Physical Activity. Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.22, Iss.2, 167-182.
  • Whiting, A. ve Williams, D.(2013). Why People UseSocial Media: A Uses And Gratifications Approach Article İn Qualitative. Market Research, Vol.16, Iss.4, 362-368.
  • Wolfradt, U. ve Pretz (2001). Individual Differences İn Creativity: Personality, Storywriting, and Hobbies. European Journal of Personality, Vol.15, Iss.4, 297–310.
  • Xu, W. W., Park, J. Y., Kim, J. Y. ve Park, H. W. (2016). Networked Cultural Diffusion And Creation on YouTube: An analysis of YouTube memes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Vol.60, Iss.1, 104–122.
  • Zhao, W. X., Jiang, J., Weng, J., He, J., Lim, E.-P., Yan, H. ve Li, X. (2011). Comparing Twitter and Traditional Media Using Topic Models. In P. Clough, C. Foley, C. Gurrin, G. J. F. Jones, W. Kraaij, H. Lee, ve V. Mudoch (Eds.), Advances in informationretrieval (pp. 338–349). New York: Springer.
  • Zuniga, H. G., Die hl, T., Huber, B. ve Liu, J. (2017). Personality Traits and Social Media Use in 20 Countries: How Personality Relates to Frequency of Social Media Use, Social Media News Use, and Social Media Use for Social Interaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavıor, And Socıal Networkıng, Vol. 20, Iss.9, 540-545.

Sosyal Medya Kullanım Motivasyonlarının Kişilik Özellikleri ve Yaşam Doyumu Açısından İncelenmesi

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1, 205 - 226, 23.03.2021

Şükran Karaca

https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.763305
Cited By: 2

Öz

Teknolojinin gelişmesiyle birlikte sosyal medya popüler hale gelmiş ve günlük hayatta yaygın olarak kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Özellikle akıllı telefon kullanımının artması ve internet bağlantısının iyileştirilmesi, sosyal medya kullanımını her geçen gün daha da arttırmıştır. Sosyal medya kullanıcılarının kişilik özellikleri ve yaşamdan elde ettikleri doyumlar ile sosyal medya araçlarının seçimi, kullanım biçimleri ve sıklığı arasında ilişki vardır. Bu nedenle bu çalışma sosyal medya kullanım motivasyonlarının kişilik özellikleri ve yaşam doyumu açısından incelenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışma kapsamında 385 kişiden çevrimiçi anket tekniğiyle elde edilen veriler analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda sosyal medya kullanıcılarının özellikle nevrotik kişilik özelliğinin sosyal medya kullanım motivasyonları ve yaşam doyumu üzerinde anlamlı etkisinin olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Sosyal Medya, Sosyal Medya Motivasyonları, Kişilik, Yaşam Doyumu
JEL Sınıflandırması: M30, M31

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal Medya Sosyal Medya Motivasyonları Kişilik Yaşam Doyumu

Kaynakça

  • Alexa (2020). The top 500 sites on the web. Retrieved April 24, 2020, from: https://www.alexa.com/topsites.
  • Alhabash, S. ve Ma, M. (2017). A Tale of Four Platforms: Motivations and Uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat Among College Students? Social Media+ Society.
  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y. ve Vinitzky, G. (2010). Social Network Use And Personality. Comput. Hum. Behav, Vol. 26, 1289-1295. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018
  • Amiel, T. ve Sargent, S. L. (2004). Individual Differences İn Internet Usage Motives. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.20, Iss.6, 711–726.
  • Avcılar, M. Y. ve Külter Demirgüneş, B. (2016). Kişilik Özelliklerinin Sosyal Medya Kullanım Motivasyonları Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Tespiti. Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics, Cilt 3, Sayı 3, 251-271.
  • Baldwin. K. ve Tinsley, H. (1988). An investigation of the validity of Tinsley and Tinsley’s (1986). Theory of leisure experience. Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 35, Iss.3, 263-267.
  • Bollen, J., Gonçalves, B., Ruan, G. ve Mao, H. (2011). Happiness is Assortative İn Online Social Networks. Artificial Life, Vol.17, Iss.3, 237-251. doi:10.1162/artl_a_00034
  • Butt, S. ve Phillips, J. G. (2008). Personality and Self-Reported Mobile Phoneuse. Comput. Hum. Behav., Vol 24, 346–360. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.019
  • Carr, C. T. ve Hayes, R. A. (2015). Social Media: Defining, Developing, And Divining. Atlantic Journal Of Communication, Vol. 23, 46–65.
  • Cha J. (2010). Factors Affecting The Frequency And Amount Of Social Networking Site Use: Motivations, Perceptions, And Privacy Concerns, First Monday, Vol.15, Iss.12, 2-16.
  • Choi, T. R., Sung, Y., Lee, J. A. ve Choi, S. M. (2017). Get Behind My Selfies: The Big Five Traits And Social Networking Behaviors Through Selfies. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 109, 98–101.
  • Clore, G. L.,Wyer Jr, R. S., Dienes, B., Gasper, K., Gohm, C. ve Isbell, L. (2001). Affective Feelings As Feedback: Some Cognitive Consequences. In L. L. Martin, ve G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A User's Guide Book (pp. 27-62). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W. ve Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?:The İntersection Of Users' Personality And Social Media Use. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26, Iss. 2, 247-253.
  • Diener, E., Sandvik, E. ve Pavot, W. (2009). Happiness is The Frequency, Not The İntensity, Of Positive Versus Negative Affect. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing Well-Being (Vol. 39, pp. 213-231). Netherlands: Springer.
  • Diener, E.,Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. ve Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 49, Iss.1, 71-75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
  • Doğan, U. (2016). Effects of Social Network Use on Happiness, Psychological Well-being, and Life Satisfaction of High School Students: Case of Facebook and Twitter. Educationand Science, Vol 41, 217-229.
  • Fullwood, C., Nicholls, W. ve Makichi, R. (2014). We’ve Got Something For Everyone: How İndividual Differences Predict Different Blogging Motivations. New Media Soc., Vol. 17, 1583–1600. doi: 10.1177/1461444814530248
  • Ghaisani, A. P., Handayani, P. W., ve Munajat, Q. (2017). Users' Motivation in Sharing Information on Social Media. Procedia Computer Science, Vol.124, 530-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.186
  • Google+ (2020). About Google+. Retrieved April 1, 2020, from: https://plus.google.com/about?hl=tr.
  • Gosling, S. D., Augustine, A. A., Vazire, S., Holtzman, N. ve Gaddis, S. (2011). Manifestations of Personality İn Online Socia Lnetworks: Self-Reported Facebook-Related Behaviors And Observable Profile İnformation. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw, Vol 14, 483–488. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0087
  • Horzum, M. B. (2016). Examining The Relationship To Gender And Personality On The Purpose Of Facebook Usage Of Turkish University Students. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 64, 319–328.
  • INTECO (2009): “Estudiosobre la privacidad de losdatospersonales y la Seguridad De La İnformación En Lasredes Sociales Online”. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología de la Comunicación y AgenciaEspañola de Protección de datos, Observatorio de la seguridad de la información, http://creativecommons.org
  • Papacharissi, Z. ve Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of İnternet Use. Journal of Broadcasting& Electronic Media, Vol. 44, Iss. 2, 175–196.
  • Jamal J. Al-Menayes (2015). Motivationsfor Using Social Media: An ExploratoryFactor Analysis, International Journal of Psychological Studies, Vol. 7, Iss. 1, 43-50.
  • Junco, R. (2013). Comparing Actual and Self-Reported Measures Of Facebook Use. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 29, Iss. 3, 626–631
  • Kahneman, D. ve Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments İn The Measurement Of Subjective Well-Being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.20, Iss. 1, 3-24.
  • Karapanos, E.,Teixeira, P. ve Gouveia, R. (2016). Need Fulfillment And Experiences On Social Media: A Case On Facebook And Whatsapp. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 55, 888–897.
  • Katz, E., Blumler, J. G. ve Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and Gratifications Research. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 37, Iss. 4, 509–523.
  • Khan, M. L. (2017). Social Media Engagement: What Motivates User Participation And Consumption On Youtube? Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.66, 236–247.
  • Kim, J. W. ve Chock, T. M. (2017). Personality Traits And Psychological Motivations Predicting Selfie Posting Behaviors On Social Networking Sites. Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 34, Iss.5, 560–571.
  • Kuss, D. J. ve Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social Networking Sites And Addiction: Ten Lessons Learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 14, 311.
  • Landers, R. N. ve Lounsbury, J. W. (2006). An investigation of BigFiveandnarrowpersonalitytraits in relationto Internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2006), 283–293.
  • Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessonsfrom a Newscience. London: Penguin Books.
  • Leary, M. R. ve Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression Management: A Literatüre Review And Two Component Model. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 107, Iss.1, 34-47. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34
  • Lee, E.,Ahn, J. ve Kim, Y. J. (2014). Personality Traits And Self-Presentation at Facebook. Pers. Individ. Diff. Vol. 69, 162–167. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.020
  • Li, Yuhui, Huang, Zhaoxhing, Wu, YenchunJim ve Wang, Zhiqiang (2019). Exploring How Personality Affects Privacy Control Behavior on Social Networking Sites, Front. Psychol, Vol. 10,1771
  • Lin, Jhih-Syuani Lee, Yen-I, Jin, Yan ve Gilbreath, Bob (2017). Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, Vol. 20, Iss.10, 615-623.
  • Liu, I. L. B., Cheung, C. M. K. ve Lee, M. K. O. (2010). Understanding Twitter Usage: What Drive People Continue T Otweet. In PACIS 2010 proceedings (p. 92). Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
  • Livingstone, S. (2010). Taking Risky Opportunities İn Youth Fulcontent Creation: Teenagers’ Use Of Social Networking Sites Forintimacy, Privacyand Self-Expression. New Media &. Society, Vol. 10, Iss..3, 393-411.
  • Lloyd, K. ve Auld, C. J. (2002). The Role of Leisure in Determining Quality Of Life: Issues of Content and Measurement. Social Indicators Research, Vol.57, Iss.1, 43-71.
  • Lu, Luo ve Hu, Chia-Hsin (2005). Personality, Leisure Experiences and Happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 6, Iss.3, 325-342.
  • Misoch, S. (2015). Stranger on The İnternet: Online Self-Disclosure and The Role Of Visual Anonymity. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.48, 535–541.
  • Moore, K. ve McElroy, J. C. (2012). The İnfluence Of Personality On Facebook Usage, Wall Postings, And Regret. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 28, Iss.1, 267–274.
  • Obi, A. N. (2014). Time Spend on Facebook vs. Total Time Spent Online: Effects On The Quality Of Life On High School Students (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Golden GateUniversity, USA.
  • Ong, E. Y. ,Ang, R. P., Ho, J., Lim, J. C., Goh, D. H., Lee, C. S., et al. (2011). Narcissism, Extraversion And Adolescents’ Self-Presentation On Facebook, Pers. Individ. Dif. Vol.50, 180–185. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.022
  • Quan-Haase, A. ve Young, A.L. (2010) Uses and Gratifications of Social Media: A Comparison of Facebook and Instant Messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Vol.30, 350-361.
  • Rae, J. R. ve Lonborg, S. D. (2015). Do Motivations Forusing Facebook Moderate The Association Between Facebook Use And Psychological Well-Being? Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6, 771.
  • Ross, C., E.S. Orr, M. Sisic, J.M. Arseneault, M.G. Simmering ve R.R. Orr (2009). Personality and Motivations Associated with Facebook Use. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 25, 578-586.
  • Rubin, A. M. (1993). Audience Activity And Media Use. Communications Monographs, Vol. 60, Iss.1, 98–105.
  • Ruggiero T. E. (2000). Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, Vol. 3, Iss.1, 3–37.
  • Ryan, T., ve Xenos, S. (2011). Who Uses Facebook? An İnvestigation İnto The Relationship Between The Big Five, Shyness, Narcissism, Loneliness, And Facebook Usage. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 27, Iss.5, 1658–1664.
  • Scheufele, D. A. ve Shah, D. V. (2000). Personality Strength And Social Capital: The Role Of Dispositional And İnformational Variables İn The Production Of Civic Participation. Journal of Communication Research, Vol.2, Iss.2, 107-131.
  • Seidman, G. (2012). Self-Presentation And Belonging On Facebook: How Personality İnfluences Social Media Use And Motivations. Pers. Individ. Dif, Vol. 54, 402–407. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.009
  • Swickert, R.,Hittner, J., Harris, J. ve Herring, J. (2002). Relationships Among Internet Use, Personality, And Social Support. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.18, Iss.4, 437–451.
  • TandocJr, E. C., Ferrucci, P. ve Duffy, M. (2015). Facebook Use, Envy, And Depression Among College Students: Is Facebooking Depressing? Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.43, 139-146.
  • Tsai, Lien-Hsiang (2003). Relationships Between Personality Attributes and Internet Marketing, A Dissertation, Alliant Internatıonal Unıversity, UMI.
  • Tuncer, D., Arpacı, T., Ayhan, Y., Böge, E. ve Üner, M. (1992). Pazarlama, Ankara: Gazi Yayınları.
  • Urista, M.A.,Dong, Q. ve Day, K.D. (2009). Explaining Why Young Adults Use My Space And Facebook Through Uses And Gratifications Theory. Human Communication, Vol.12, Iss.2, 215- 229.
  • Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend Networking Sites And Their Relationship To Adolescents' Well-Being Ands Ocial Self-Esteem. Cyberpsychol & Behavior, Vol. 9, Iss.5, 584-590.
  • Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users Like You? Theorizin Gagency in User-Generated Content. Media. Culture & Society, Vol. 31, Iss.1, 41-58.
  • Wang, Y. (2006). Internet Use Among Students and Its Implication for Cross-Cultural Adaptation Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Kent State University.
  • Wankel, L. ve Berger, B. (1990). The Psychological And Social Benefits Of Sport And Physical Activity. Journal of Leisure Research, Vol.22, Iss.2, 167-182.
  • Whiting, A. ve Williams, D.(2013). Why People UseSocial Media: A Uses And Gratifications Approach Article İn Qualitative. Market Research, Vol.16, Iss.4, 362-368.
  • Wolfradt, U. ve Pretz (2001). Individual Differences İn Creativity: Personality, Storywriting, and Hobbies. European Journal of Personality, Vol.15, Iss.4, 297–310.
  • Xu, W. W., Park, J. Y., Kim, J. Y. ve Park, H. W. (2016). Networked Cultural Diffusion And Creation on YouTube: An analysis of YouTube memes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Vol.60, Iss.1, 104–122.
  • Zhao, W. X., Jiang, J., Weng, J., He, J., Lim, E.-P., Yan, H. ve Li, X. (2011). Comparing Twitter and Traditional Media Using Topic Models. In P. Clough, C. Foley, C. Gurrin, G. J. F. Jones, W. Kraaij, H. Lee, ve V. Mudoch (Eds.), Advances in informationretrieval (pp. 338–349). New York: Springer.
  • Zuniga, H. G., Die hl, T., Huber, B. ve Liu, J. (2017). Personality Traits and Social Media Use in 20 Countries: How Personality Relates to Frequency of Social Media Use, Social Media News Use, and Social Media Use for Social Interaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavıor, And Socıal Networkıng, Vol. 20, Iss.9, 540-545.
Toplam 67 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Şükran Karaca 0000-0002-0268-1810

Yayımlanma Tarihi 23 Mart 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Karaca, Ş. (2021). Sosyal Medya Kullanım Motivasyonlarının Kişilik Özellikleri ve Yaşam Doyumu Açısından İncelenmesi. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 28(1), 205-226. https://doi.org/10.18657/yonveek.763305

Cited By

The Effect of Personality Factors on Social Appearance Anxiety and Life Satisfaction
International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences
https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.1353952
EFFECT OF SOCIAL MEDIA USE AND SELF-PROMOTION ON TRAVEL PHOTO SHARING
Academic Review of Humanities and Social Sciences
https://doi.org/10.54186/arhuss.1129367
 Kapak Resmi İndir