Araştırma Makalesi
Impacts of Gambling on Students’ Life, the Case of Eastern Mediterranean University: A Grounded Theory Research
Öz
The aim of the research is to investigate the effects on gambling on the users of such activities that are namely students. The research was done with the aid of 10 interviewers that are all students of Eastern Mediterranean University. Grounded Theory approach which is a qualitative research model and was applied into the research true the use of statements collected from 10 semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was used to gather candidates and their content were taken in the consideration. By result; only those approved the interviews were involved to the research. The commonly shared values of students shown that in the categories of “Academic Life”, “Negative Social Life”, “Family Life”, “Economic Life” and “Health Life”, negative effects were mentioned majorly. On the other hand, “Negatively Effect on Social Life” and “Free Time” have shown somewhat neutral or positives statements regarding to topic.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Auerbach, C.F. and Silverstein, L.B. (2003). Qualitative Data: An Inroduction to Coding and Analysis. USA: New York University Press. Avis, Drysdale, Gregg, Neufeldt, and Scargill, (1983). Gage Canadian Dictionary. Gage Publishing, Toronto, Ontario. Bodger, D. (1998). Leisure, learning, and travel. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 69 (4), 28. Corbin, J. M. & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 19(6), 418-427. Das, A.K. (1990). Counselling people with addictive behavior. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 13,169-177. Donaldson, R. & J. Gatsinzi (2005), ‘‘Foreign Students as Tourists: Educational Tourism, A Market Segment with Potential.’’ Africa Insight, 35(3), 19-24.
- Engwall, D., Hunter, R., Steinberg M.. (2004). Gambling and other risk behaviors on university campuses. Journal of American College Health. Vol. 52. No. 6, 245-255. Ferris, J &Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: User's manual. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. Electronic version available at www.ccsa.ca Fisher, S. (2000). Measuring the prevalence of sector-specific problem gambling: A study of casino patrons. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 25-51. Glaser, B.G & Strauss, A. (2012). The Discovery of Grounded theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (7th Paperback Edition), USA: Aldine Transaction. Hannum, E. and Buchman, C. (2003). The Consequences of Global Educational Expansion: Social Science Perspectives, Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Hira, T. K., and K. W. Monson. 2000. “A Social Learning Perspective of Gambling Behavior among College Students at Iowa State University, USA.” Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics 24 (1): 1–8. Kawulich, B. B. (2004). Data analysis techniques in qualitative research. Journal of Research in Education, 14(1), 96-113. King, N. (2004). Using interviews in qualitative research. In C. Cassell and S. Gillian (Eds.) Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage.
- LaBrie, R. A., H. J. Shaffer, D. A. LaPlante, and H. Wechsler. 2003. “Correlates of College Student Gambling in the United States.” Journal of American College Health 52 (2): 53–62 Ladouceur, R., Arsenault, C., Dube, D., Freeston, M.H., & Jacques, C. (1997). Psychological characteristics on volunteers in studies on gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 69-84. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Rohde, P., Seeley, J.R., & Rohling, M.L. (2004). Individual, family, and peer correlated of adolescent gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 23-46. Lesieur, H.R., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Pathological gambling: A review of the literature, Journal of Gambling Studies, 7, 5-40. Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd Edition). USA: SAGE. Miliora, M.T. (1997). A self-psychological study of a shared gambling fantasy in Eugene O'Neill's Hughie. Journal of Gambling Studies, 1 3 ,105-123. Moore, S. M., and K. Ohtsuka. 1997. “Gambling Activities of Young Australians: Developing a Model of Behaviour.” Journal of Gambling Studies 13 (3): 207–236. National Research Council. (1999). Pathological Gambling: A Critical Review.Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Richards, L. (2010). Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide (2nd Edition). London: SAGE. Ritchie, J. & J. Lewis (2003), Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. 1st ed.GreatBritian: Sage Publications Ltd. Rosenthal, R. (1992). Pathological gambling. Psychiatric Annals, 22, 72-78. Saldaña, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: SAGE. Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & VanderBilt, J. V. (1997). Estimating the Prevalence of Disordered Gambling in the United States and Canada: A metaanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Medical School Division of Addictions. Shaffer, H., Hall, M., Vander Bilt, J. (2000, September). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United State and Canada: A research synthesis. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 89, No. 9, 1369-1376. Smith, G.J., Volberg, R.A., & Wynne, H.J. (1994). Leisure behaviour on the edge: Differences between controlled and uncontrolled gambling practices. Eoisir et Societe/Society and Eeisure, 1 7 ,233-248. Strauss, A.L. (2003). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (Paperback Edition). UK: Cambridge University Press. Walker, M.B., & Dickerson, M.G. (1996). The prevalence of problem and pathological gambling: a critical analysis. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 233-248. Wickwire Jr., E. M., J. P. Whelan, R. West, A. Meyers, C. McCausland, and J. Leullen. 2007. “Perceived Availability, Risks, and Benefits of Gambling among College Students.” Journal of Gambling Studies 23 (4): 395–408.
Kumar Oynamanın Öğrencilerin Hayatlarına Etkileri, Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi Örneği: Bir Gömülü Teori Araştırması
Öz
Bu araştırmanın amacı kumar oynamanın öğrenciler üzerinde yarattığı etkiyi tespit etmektir. Araştırma Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi'nde öğrenimlerine devam eden on öğrenci ile yapılmıştır. Nicel araştırma tekniklerinden Gömülü Teori'nin uygulandığı araştırmada katılımcılara on adet yarı-yapılandırılmış sorular sorulmuştur. Araştırmada amaçlı örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır ve kumar oynayan öğrenciler araştırmaya dahil edilmiştir. Sadece gönüllü olan kişiler araştırmaya katılım göstermiştir. Araştırma sonucunda ise olumsuz kategoriler "Akademik Hayat", "Sosyal Hayatın Olumsuzluğu", "Aile Hayatı", "Ekonomik Hayat"ve "Sağlık Hayatı" olarak tespit edilmiştir. Bunun yanı sıra araştırmada "Sosyal Hayat" ve "Boş Zaman" olumlu kategoriler olarak tespit edilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Eğitim Turizmi Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kumar Oynaması Gömülü Teori
Kaynakça
- Auerbach, C.F. and Silverstein, L.B. (2003). Qualitative Data: An Inroduction to Coding and Analysis. USA: New York University Press. Avis, Drysdale, Gregg, Neufeldt, and Scargill, (1983). Gage Canadian Dictionary. Gage Publishing, Toronto, Ontario. Bodger, D. (1998). Leisure, learning, and travel. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 69 (4), 28. Corbin, J. M. & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 19(6), 418-427. Das, A.K. (1990). Counselling people with addictive behavior. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 13,169-177. Donaldson, R. & J. Gatsinzi (2005), ‘‘Foreign Students as Tourists: Educational Tourism, A Market Segment with Potential.’’ Africa Insight, 35(3), 19-24.
- Engwall, D., Hunter, R., Steinberg M.. (2004). Gambling and other risk behaviors on university campuses. Journal of American College Health. Vol. 52. No. 6, 245-255. Ferris, J &Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: User's manual. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. Electronic version available at www.ccsa.ca Fisher, S. (2000). Measuring the prevalence of sector-specific problem gambling: A study of casino patrons. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 25-51. Glaser, B.G & Strauss, A. (2012). The Discovery of Grounded theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (7th Paperback Edition), USA: Aldine Transaction. Hannum, E. and Buchman, C. (2003). The Consequences of Global Educational Expansion: Social Science Perspectives, Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Hira, T. K., and K. W. Monson. 2000. “A Social Learning Perspective of Gambling Behavior among College Students at Iowa State University, USA.” Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics 24 (1): 1–8. Kawulich, B. B. (2004). Data analysis techniques in qualitative research. Journal of Research in Education, 14(1), 96-113. King, N. (2004). Using interviews in qualitative research. In C. Cassell and S. Gillian (Eds.) Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage.
- LaBrie, R. A., H. J. Shaffer, D. A. LaPlante, and H. Wechsler. 2003. “Correlates of College Student Gambling in the United States.” Journal of American College Health 52 (2): 53–62 Ladouceur, R., Arsenault, C., Dube, D., Freeston, M.H., & Jacques, C. (1997). Psychological characteristics on volunteers in studies on gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 69-84. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Rohde, P., Seeley, J.R., & Rohling, M.L. (2004). Individual, family, and peer correlated of adolescent gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 23-46. Lesieur, H.R., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Pathological gambling: A review of the literature, Journal of Gambling Studies, 7, 5-40. Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd Edition). USA: SAGE. Miliora, M.T. (1997). A self-psychological study of a shared gambling fantasy in Eugene O'Neill's Hughie. Journal of Gambling Studies, 1 3 ,105-123. Moore, S. M., and K. Ohtsuka. 1997. “Gambling Activities of Young Australians: Developing a Model of Behaviour.” Journal of Gambling Studies 13 (3): 207–236. National Research Council. (1999). Pathological Gambling: A Critical Review.Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Richards, L. (2010). Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide (2nd Edition). London: SAGE. Ritchie, J. & J. Lewis (2003), Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. 1st ed.GreatBritian: Sage Publications Ltd. Rosenthal, R. (1992). Pathological gambling. Psychiatric Annals, 22, 72-78. Saldaña, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: SAGE. Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & VanderBilt, J. V. (1997). Estimating the Prevalence of Disordered Gambling in the United States and Canada: A metaanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Medical School Division of Addictions. Shaffer, H., Hall, M., Vander Bilt, J. (2000, September). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United State and Canada: A research synthesis. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 89, No. 9, 1369-1376. Smith, G.J., Volberg, R.A., & Wynne, H.J. (1994). Leisure behaviour on the edge: Differences between controlled and uncontrolled gambling practices. Eoisir et Societe/Society and Eeisure, 1 7 ,233-248. Strauss, A.L. (2003). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (Paperback Edition). UK: Cambridge University Press. Walker, M.B., & Dickerson, M.G. (1996). The prevalence of problem and pathological gambling: a critical analysis. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 233-248. Wickwire Jr., E. M., J. P. Whelan, R. West, A. Meyers, C. McCausland, and J. Leullen. 2007. “Perceived Availability, Risks, and Benefits of Gambling among College Students.” Journal of Gambling Studies 23 (4): 395–408.
Toplam 3 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Konular | Turizm (Diğer) |
| Bölüm | Makaleler |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 31 Aralık 2018 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2018 Kış |