Araştırma Makalesi
Yıl 2024,
Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1, 454 - 469, 30.04.2024
Öz
Günümüz dünyasında çok sayıda sosyal ve doğal olaylarla ilgili bilimsel tartışmalara şahitlik edilmektedir. Birleşmiş Milletler tarafından 2016 yılında deklare edilen ve 17 ana başlık altında toplanan sürdürülebilir kalkınma amaçlarına ulaşabilmek ve üzerinde yaşadığımız dünya gezegenini daha sürdürülebilir yapmak için mikro düzeyden makro düzeye kadar; bireyler, topluluklar, işletmeler ve ülkeler çalışmalar yapmaktadırlar. Bu kapsamda, özellikle bireylerin tüketim niyetlerinde duyarlılıklarını ve farkındalıklarını arttırmaya yönelik akademik çalışmalarda öne çıkmaya başlamıştır. Bu araştırmada, tüketicilerin sürdürülebilir tüketime yönelik eğilimleri üzerinde kolektif psikolojik sahiplik, çevresel değerler, çevreci kimlik ve normların etkisini belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile toplanan verilerden 285’i geçerli sayılmış ve analiz edilmiştir. Gönüllü olarak çalışmaya katılmayı kabul eden kişilerden veriler toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçları incelendiğinde, önceki çalışmalarla uyumlu olarak biyosferik ve özgeci değerler ile kolektif psikolojik sahipliğin çevresel benlik üzerinde; çevresel benliğin, kişisel normlar üzerinde ve kişisel normların sürdürülebilir tüketim eğilimi üzerinde etkisi olduğu bulunmuştur.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Sürdürülebilir tüketim Çevresel değerler Kolektif Psikolojik Sahiplik
Etik Beyan
Etik onay: Çağ Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Etik Kurulunun 06/06/2022 tarih ve 2022/3 sayılı etik kurul kararı
Destekleyen Kurum
yok
Teşekkür
yok
Kaynakça
- Ajibade, I., & Boateng, G. O. (2021). Predicting why people engage in pro-sustainable behaviors in Portland Oregon: The role of environmental self-identity, personal norm, and socio-demographics. Journal of environmental management, 289, 112538.
- Ateş, H. (2020). Merging theory of planned behavior and value ıdentity personal norm model to explain pro-environmental behaviors. Sustainable production and consumption, 24, 169-180.
- Becerra-Villanueva,J.B., Molina-Huelva,M., Barrios-Padura,A. (2023). Sensitivity analysis of trends in environmental education in schools and its implications in the built environment, Environmental development 45, 100795
- Beck, U. (2011). Risk toplumu: başka bir modernliğe doğru. İthaki Yayınları. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of consumer research, 15(2), 139-168.
- Bouman, T., Steg A., L., Kiers, (2018). “Measuring values in environmental research: a test of an environmental portrait value questionnaire”, Frontiers in psychology, April 2018,1-15.
- Buran, İ. (2023). Paylaşım ekonomisi hizmetlerinin faydalar perspektifinde psikolojik sahiplik ve tüketici katılımı açısından incelenmesi, (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
- Churchill Jr, G. A. (1979). “A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs”. Journal of marketing research, 16(1), 64-73.
- De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and behavior, 40(3), 330–35.
- Dermody,J, Lewis, N.K., Zhao, A.L., -Lloyd, S.H., (2018) Appraising the influence of pro-environmental self-identity on sustainable consumption buying and curtailment in emerging markets: Evidence from China and Poland, Journal of business research,86, 333-343.
- Díaz MF, Charry A, Sellitti S, Ruzzante M, Enciso K and Burkart S (2020) Psychological factors ınfluencing pro-environmental behavior in developing countries: evidence from colombian and nicaraguan students. Front. psychol. 11:580730. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580730
- Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R. (2005). Environmental values. Annual review of environment and resources., 30, 335-372.
- Durning, A. (1997), Ne kadarı yeterli: tüketim toplumu ve dünyanın geleceği. Tübitak-Tema Vakfı Yayınları.
- Dziuban, C. D. ve Shirkey, E. C. (2007). “When Is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? some decision rule”s. Psychological bulletin, 81, 358–361.
- Ercis, A., Celik, B. (2018). Selfless or skeptical consumer?. Journal of business, economics and finance (JBEF), V.7(4), p.332-339.
- Felix, R., & Almaguer, J. (2019). Nourish what you own: psychological ownership, materialism and pro-environmental behavioral intentions. Journal of consumer marketing, 36(1), 82-91.
- Field, A. (2000). “Discovering statistics using spss for windows”. Sage Publications Ltd. Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
- Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. ve Black, W. C. (1998). “Multivariate data analysis”. New Jersey. Prentice-Hall.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W.C., Babin, B. J. ve Anderson, R. E. (2010). “Multivariate data analysis”. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Harland, P., Staats, H. and Wilke, H.A.M. (1999), Explaining proenvironmental ıntention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior†. Journal of applied social psychology, 29: 2505-2528.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115–135.
- Hornsey,M.J.,Harris, E.A., Bain, P.G., ve Fielding, K.S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature climate change 6, 622–6.
- Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S.B. ve Podsakoff, P.M. (2003). “A critical review of construct ındicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research” Journal of consumer research, 30(2), 199-218.
- Jussila, I., Tarkiainen, A., Sarstedt, M., & Hair, J. F. (2015). Individual psychological ownership: Concepts, evidence, and implications for research in marketing. Journal of marketing theory and practice, 23(2), 121-139.
- Katz-Gerro, T., Greenspan, I., Handy, F., & Lee, H.-Y. (2017). The relationship between value types and environmental behaviour in four countries: universalism, benevolence, conformity and biospheric values revisited. Environmental values, 26(2), 223-249.
- Kement Ü (2019). Ekoturizm faaliyetlerine katılan bireylerin değer inanç norm teorisi kapsamında çevre dostu davranışlarının açıklanması, E-SBD, 18 (72), 2182-95. Kim, H., Li, J., & So, K. K. F. (2024). Psychological ownership research in business: A bibliometric overview and future research directions. Journal of business research, 174, 114502.
- Lavuri, R.; Akram, U.; Akram, Z. (2023). Exploring the sustainable consumption behavior in emerging countries: The role of pro-environmental self-identity, attitude, and environmental protection emotion. Bus. strategy environ. 2023; early view.
- Lee, Y., Ha, S. & Kim, Y., (2024) “What drives green apparel consumption? “We” beyond “I””, International Textile and Apparel Association Annual Conference Proceedings 80(1).
- MacKenzie, S. B. ve Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias ın marketing: causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of retailing, 88(4), 542-555.
- Minton, E.A., Xie, H.J, Atay,E.G., Kahle,L.R:, (2018). Sustainable consumption and subjective well‐being, International Journal of consumer studies, 42,655-663.
- Mishra, S., Malhotra, G., Chatterjee, R., & Kareem Abdul, W. (2023). Ecological consciousness and sustainable purchase behavior: the mediating role of psychological ownership. Asia pacific journal of marketing and logistics, 35(2), 414-431.
- Mittal, B. (2006). I, me, and mine—How products become consumers' extended selves. Journal of consumer behaviour, 5(6), 550-562.
- Morewedge, C. K., Monga, A., Palmatier, R. W., Shu, S. B., & Small, D. A. (2021). Evolution of consumption: A psychological ownership framework. Journal of marketing, 85(1), 196-218.
- Nunnally, J. C. ve Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychological theory. New York, NY: MacGraw-Hill.
- Peck, J., Kirk, C. P., Luangrath, A. W., & Shu, S. B. (2021). Caring for the commons: Using psychological ownership to enhance stewardship behavior for public goods. Journal of marketing, 85(2), 33-49.
- Podsakoff, P. M. ve Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-Reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of management, 12(4), 531-544.
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. ve Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.
- Roos, D., Hahn,R. (2017). Does shared consumption affect consumers' values, attitudes, and norms? A panel study, Journal of business research,77 113-123, ISSN 0148-2963,
- Ruepert,A., Keizer,K.K., Stega, L., Maricchiolo,F., Carrus,G., Dumitruc,A., Mirac,R.G., Stancud,A., Moza,D., (2016). Environmental considerations in the organizational context: A pathway to pro-environmental behaviour at work, Energy research & social science 17 (2016) 59–70.
- Sabah, S. (2019). Kızım olmadan asla: anne kız tüketim pratikleri ve narsisizm kapsamında değerlendirilmesi, Anadolu üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi, 19 (1)137-154.
- Schuster,C., Goseberg, T., Arnold J., & Sundermann A. (2024) I share because of who I am: values, identities, norms, and attitudes explain sharing intentions, The journal of social psychology, 164:2, 199-217, DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2022.2044282
- Schwartz, S.H. (1992), Universals in the content and structure of values, theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries, Adv. exp.soc. psychology, 25 -1-65.
- Shankar, A., Fitchett, J. A. (2002). Having, being and consumption. Journal of marketing management, 18, 501-516.
- Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., Van der Werff, E., & Lurvink, J. (2014). The significance of hedonic values for environmentally relevant attitudes, preferences, and actions. Environment and behavior, 46(2), 163-192. Stern, P. C. Dietz, T. (1994).” The value basis of environmental concern”, Journal of social ıssue, 50 (3), 65-84.
- Stern P.C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior, Journal of social issues, 56 (3).407-424.
- Sudbury-Riley, L., & Kohlbacher, F. (2016). “Ethically minded consumer behavior: Scale review, development, and validation”. Journal of business research, 69(8), 2697-2710.
- Süssenbach, S., & Kamleitner, B. (2018). Psychological ownership as a facilitator of sustainable behaviors. Psychological ownership and consumer behavior, 211-225.
- Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013). The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of environmental psychology, 34, 55-63.
- Wang, X., Fielding, K. S., & Dean, A. J. (2023). “Nature is mine/ours”: Measuring individual and collective psychological ownership of nature. Journal of environmental psychology, 85, 101919.
- Werff, E.V. & Steg, L. (2016). “The psychology of participation and interest in smart energy systems: Comparing the value-belief-norm theory and the value-identity-personal norm model”, Energy research & social science 22, 107-114.
- White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to shıft consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: a literature review and guiding framework. Journal of marketing, 83(3), 22-49.
- Yarimoglu E, Binboga G. (2019). “Understanding sustainable consumption in an emerging country: The antecedents and consequences of the ecologically conscious consumer behavior model”, Bus strat env. 28, 642–651.
EXAMİNİG COLLECTIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP AND ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES ON THE AXIS OFSUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION
Öz
Numerous scientific claims about social and natural phenomena are argued in our contemporary society. From the micro to macro level, individuals, communities, businesses, and nations strive to attain the sustainable development goals declared by the United Nations in 2016, which were compiled under 17 main articles to make the planet we live on more sustainable. Academic research focused on enhancing individuals' awareness and sensitivity regarding their consumption intentions has emerged as a prominent area of inquiry in this context. The objective of this study is to ascertain the influence that norms, collective psychological ownership, environmental values, and environmental identity have on the tendency of consumers to engage in sustainable consumption. Analyses were conducted on data collected via convenience sampling from 285 valid participants. The data was gathered from participants who voluntarily consented to participate in the research. In line with prior investigations, findings reveal that, environmental identity is influenced by biocentric and altruistic values along with collective psychological ownership; while environmental identity influences personal norms, and personal norms influence sustainable consumption tendencies.
Anahtar Kelimeler
sustainable consumption environmental values collective psychological ownership
Kaynakça
- Ajibade, I., & Boateng, G. O. (2021). Predicting why people engage in pro-sustainable behaviors in Portland Oregon: The role of environmental self-identity, personal norm, and socio-demographics. Journal of environmental management, 289, 112538.
- Ateş, H. (2020). Merging theory of planned behavior and value ıdentity personal norm model to explain pro-environmental behaviors. Sustainable production and consumption, 24, 169-180.
- Becerra-Villanueva,J.B., Molina-Huelva,M., Barrios-Padura,A. (2023). Sensitivity analysis of trends in environmental education in schools and its implications in the built environment, Environmental development 45, 100795
- Beck, U. (2011). Risk toplumu: başka bir modernliğe doğru. İthaki Yayınları. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of consumer research, 15(2), 139-168.
- Bouman, T., Steg A., L., Kiers, (2018). “Measuring values in environmental research: a test of an environmental portrait value questionnaire”, Frontiers in psychology, April 2018,1-15.
- Buran, İ. (2023). Paylaşım ekonomisi hizmetlerinin faydalar perspektifinde psikolojik sahiplik ve tüketici katılımı açısından incelenmesi, (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
- Churchill Jr, G. A. (1979). “A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs”. Journal of marketing research, 16(1), 64-73.
- De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and behavior, 40(3), 330–35.
- Dermody,J, Lewis, N.K., Zhao, A.L., -Lloyd, S.H., (2018) Appraising the influence of pro-environmental self-identity on sustainable consumption buying and curtailment in emerging markets: Evidence from China and Poland, Journal of business research,86, 333-343.
- Díaz MF, Charry A, Sellitti S, Ruzzante M, Enciso K and Burkart S (2020) Psychological factors ınfluencing pro-environmental behavior in developing countries: evidence from colombian and nicaraguan students. Front. psychol. 11:580730. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580730
- Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R. (2005). Environmental values. Annual review of environment and resources., 30, 335-372.
- Durning, A. (1997), Ne kadarı yeterli: tüketim toplumu ve dünyanın geleceği. Tübitak-Tema Vakfı Yayınları.
- Dziuban, C. D. ve Shirkey, E. C. (2007). “When Is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? some decision rule”s. Psychological bulletin, 81, 358–361.
- Ercis, A., Celik, B. (2018). Selfless or skeptical consumer?. Journal of business, economics and finance (JBEF), V.7(4), p.332-339.
- Felix, R., & Almaguer, J. (2019). Nourish what you own: psychological ownership, materialism and pro-environmental behavioral intentions. Journal of consumer marketing, 36(1), 82-91.
- Field, A. (2000). “Discovering statistics using spss for windows”. Sage Publications Ltd. Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”. Journal of marketing research, 39-50.
- Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. ve Black, W. C. (1998). “Multivariate data analysis”. New Jersey. Prentice-Hall.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W.C., Babin, B. J. ve Anderson, R. E. (2010). “Multivariate data analysis”. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Harland, P., Staats, H. and Wilke, H.A.M. (1999), Explaining proenvironmental ıntention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior†. Journal of applied social psychology, 29: 2505-2528.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115–135.
- Hornsey,M.J.,Harris, E.A., Bain, P.G., ve Fielding, K.S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature climate change 6, 622–6.
- Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S.B. ve Podsakoff, P.M. (2003). “A critical review of construct ındicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research” Journal of consumer research, 30(2), 199-218.
- Jussila, I., Tarkiainen, A., Sarstedt, M., & Hair, J. F. (2015). Individual psychological ownership: Concepts, evidence, and implications for research in marketing. Journal of marketing theory and practice, 23(2), 121-139.
- Katz-Gerro, T., Greenspan, I., Handy, F., & Lee, H.-Y. (2017). The relationship between value types and environmental behaviour in four countries: universalism, benevolence, conformity and biospheric values revisited. Environmental values, 26(2), 223-249.
- Kement Ü (2019). Ekoturizm faaliyetlerine katılan bireylerin değer inanç norm teorisi kapsamında çevre dostu davranışlarının açıklanması, E-SBD, 18 (72), 2182-95. Kim, H., Li, J., & So, K. K. F. (2024). Psychological ownership research in business: A bibliometric overview and future research directions. Journal of business research, 174, 114502.
- Lavuri, R.; Akram, U.; Akram, Z. (2023). Exploring the sustainable consumption behavior in emerging countries: The role of pro-environmental self-identity, attitude, and environmental protection emotion. Bus. strategy environ. 2023; early view.
- Lee, Y., Ha, S. & Kim, Y., (2024) “What drives green apparel consumption? “We” beyond “I””, International Textile and Apparel Association Annual Conference Proceedings 80(1).
- MacKenzie, S. B. ve Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias ın marketing: causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of retailing, 88(4), 542-555.
- Minton, E.A., Xie, H.J, Atay,E.G., Kahle,L.R:, (2018). Sustainable consumption and subjective well‐being, International Journal of consumer studies, 42,655-663.
- Mishra, S., Malhotra, G., Chatterjee, R., & Kareem Abdul, W. (2023). Ecological consciousness and sustainable purchase behavior: the mediating role of psychological ownership. Asia pacific journal of marketing and logistics, 35(2), 414-431.
- Mittal, B. (2006). I, me, and mine—How products become consumers' extended selves. Journal of consumer behaviour, 5(6), 550-562.
- Morewedge, C. K., Monga, A., Palmatier, R. W., Shu, S. B., & Small, D. A. (2021). Evolution of consumption: A psychological ownership framework. Journal of marketing, 85(1), 196-218.
- Nunnally, J. C. ve Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychological theory. New York, NY: MacGraw-Hill.
- Peck, J., Kirk, C. P., Luangrath, A. W., & Shu, S. B. (2021). Caring for the commons: Using psychological ownership to enhance stewardship behavior for public goods. Journal of marketing, 85(2), 33-49.
- Podsakoff, P. M. ve Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-Reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of management, 12(4), 531-544.
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. ve Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.
- Roos, D., Hahn,R. (2017). Does shared consumption affect consumers' values, attitudes, and norms? A panel study, Journal of business research,77 113-123, ISSN 0148-2963,
- Ruepert,A., Keizer,K.K., Stega, L., Maricchiolo,F., Carrus,G., Dumitruc,A., Mirac,R.G., Stancud,A., Moza,D., (2016). Environmental considerations in the organizational context: A pathway to pro-environmental behaviour at work, Energy research & social science 17 (2016) 59–70.
- Sabah, S. (2019). Kızım olmadan asla: anne kız tüketim pratikleri ve narsisizm kapsamında değerlendirilmesi, Anadolu üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi, 19 (1)137-154.
- Schuster,C., Goseberg, T., Arnold J., & Sundermann A. (2024) I share because of who I am: values, identities, norms, and attitudes explain sharing intentions, The journal of social psychology, 164:2, 199-217, DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2022.2044282
- Schwartz, S.H. (1992), Universals in the content and structure of values, theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries, Adv. exp.soc. psychology, 25 -1-65.
- Shankar, A., Fitchett, J. A. (2002). Having, being and consumption. Journal of marketing management, 18, 501-516.
- Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., Van der Werff, E., & Lurvink, J. (2014). The significance of hedonic values for environmentally relevant attitudes, preferences, and actions. Environment and behavior, 46(2), 163-192. Stern, P. C. Dietz, T. (1994).” The value basis of environmental concern”, Journal of social ıssue, 50 (3), 65-84.
- Stern P.C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior, Journal of social issues, 56 (3).407-424.
- Sudbury-Riley, L., & Kohlbacher, F. (2016). “Ethically minded consumer behavior: Scale review, development, and validation”. Journal of business research, 69(8), 2697-2710.
- Süssenbach, S., & Kamleitner, B. (2018). Psychological ownership as a facilitator of sustainable behaviors. Psychological ownership and consumer behavior, 211-225.
- Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013). The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of environmental psychology, 34, 55-63.
- Wang, X., Fielding, K. S., & Dean, A. J. (2023). “Nature is mine/ours”: Measuring individual and collective psychological ownership of nature. Journal of environmental psychology, 85, 101919.
- Werff, E.V. & Steg, L. (2016). “The psychology of participation and interest in smart energy systems: Comparing the value-belief-norm theory and the value-identity-personal norm model”, Energy research & social science 22, 107-114.
- White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to shıft consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: a literature review and guiding framework. Journal of marketing, 83(3), 22-49.
- Yarimoglu E, Binboga G. (2019). “Understanding sustainable consumption in an emerging country: The antecedents and consequences of the ecologically conscious consumer behavior model”, Bus strat env. 28, 642–651.
Toplam 51 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Konular | Pazarlama (Diğer) |
| Bölüm | Makaleler |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Nisan 2024 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 14 Mart 2024 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 4 Nisan 2024 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2024 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1 |
